
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Curierul Judiciar &#187; Jurisprudenţă</title>
	<atom:link href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/category/actualitate-legislativa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro</link>
	<description>Revista ta de drept</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 07:43:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ICCJ a solutionat 4 RIL-uri in sedinta din 14 mai</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/16/iccj-a-solutionat-4-ril-uri-in-sedinta-din-14-mai/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/16/iccj-a-solutionat-4-ril-uri-in-sedinta-din-14-mai/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instanţe naţionale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Codul de procedură civilă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Codul de procedură fiscală]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decretul-lege 118/1990]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domiciliu obligatoriu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drepturile copilului]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insolvenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legea 272/2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legea 3/1977]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legea 85/2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OUG 4/2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ril admis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stagiul complet de cotizare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strămutare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In sedinta din 14 mai 2012, Inalta Curte de Casatie si Justitie – Completul competent sa judece recursul in interesul legii, legal constituit in fiecare dintre cauze, a solutionat un numar de 4 recursuri in interesul legii.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/09/21/ril-uri-promovate-19-septembrie/" rel="bookmark">RIL-uri promovate, 19 septembrie</a><!-- (14)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/07/14/ril-admis-suspendarea-conditionata-a-executarii-pedepsei-stabilite-pentru-o-infractiune-intentionata/" rel="bookmark">RIL admis. Suspendarea conditionata a executarii pedepsei stabilite pentru o infractiune intentionata</a><!-- (10.9)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/04/05/patru-ril-admise-in-materie-civila/" rel="bookmark">Patru RIL admise in materie civila</a><!-- (10.8)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/16/iccj-a-solutionat-4-ril-uri-in-sedinta-din-14-mai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CEDO. Cauza Albu si altii impotriva Romaniei</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/14/cedo-cauza-albu-si-altii-impotriva-romaniei/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/14/cedo-cauza-albu-si-altii-impotriva-romaniei/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtea Europeană a Drepturilor Omului]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albu si altii impotriva Romaniei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreptul la un proces echitabil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CEDO a constatat neincalcarea de catre statul roman a art. 6 din Conventie privind dreptul la un proces echitabil in cauza <i>Albu si altii impotriva Romaniei</i>, in care 64 de functionari publici ai AOFM Caras Severin s-au plans de faptul ca instantele nationale le-au respins cererile de acordare a sporului de grad si de treapta, desi, la nivelul tarii, au existat instante care au admis actiuni similare.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/03/15/cedo-cauza-stefanica-si-altii-impotriva-romaniei/" rel="bookmark">CEDO. Cauza Stefanica si altii impotriva Romaniei</a><!-- (25.7)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/03/02/cedo-cauza-antonescu-impotriva-romaniei/" rel="bookmark">CEDO. Cauza Antonescu impotriva Romaniei</a><!-- (21.9)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2010/12/02/cauza-cedo-stoian-impotriva-romaniei/" rel="bookmark">Cauza CEDO Stoian impotriva Romaniei</a><!-- (21.3)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/14/cedo-cauza-albu-si-altii-impotriva-romaniei/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CJUE a stabilit ca specificatiile tehnice pot fi formulate in termeni de performante sau de cerinte functionale</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/11/cjue-a-stabilit-ca-specificatiile-tehnice-pot-fi-formulate-in-termeni-de-performante-sau-de-cerinte-functionale/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/11/cjue-a-stabilit-ca-specificatiile-tehnice-pot-fi-formulate-in-termeni-de-performante-sau-de-cerinte-functionale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 08:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtea de Justiţie a Uniunii Europene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caiet de sarcini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cerinte functionale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJUE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specificatiile tehnice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[termeni de performante]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CJUE a aratat ca Dreptul Uniunii nu se opune, in principiu, unui contract de achizitii publice pentru care autoritatea contractanta impune sau doreste ca anumite produse care urmeaza sa fie furnizate sa provina din agricultura ecologica sau din comertul echitabil.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/06/21/sinteze-cjue-%e2%80%93-martie-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze CJUE – Martie 2011</a><!-- (7.8)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/03/26/cjue-cauza-nilas-si-altii/" rel="bookmark">CJUE: Cauza Nilas si altii</a><!-- (7.8)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-cjue-decembrie-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze CJUE – decembrie 2011</a><!-- (7.8)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/11/cjue-a-stabilit-ca-specificatiile-tehnice-pot-fi-formulate-in-termeni-de-performante-sau-de-cerinte-functionale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIL admis. Mandat european de arestare. Intreruperea prescriptiei executarii pedepsei</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/07/ril-admis-mandat-european-de-arestare-intreruperea-prescriptiei-executarii-pedepsei/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/07/ril-admis-mandat-european-de-arestare-intreruperea-prescriptiei-executarii-pedepsei/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 07:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Instanţe naţionale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executarea pedepsei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intreruperea prescriptiei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandat european de arestare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ril admis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transmiterea directa a mandatului european de arestare emis de autoritatile romane catre autoritatile judiciare ale altui stat membru, pe teritoriul caruia a fost localizata persoana, indiferent daca aceasta este sau nu arestata provizoriu in vederea predarii, are efect de intrerupere a prescriptiei executarii pedepsei.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/07/14/ril-admis-suspendarea-conditionata-a-executarii-pedepsei-stabilite-pentru-o-infractiune-intentionata/" rel="bookmark">RIL admis. Suspendarea conditionata a executarii pedepsei stabilite pentru o infractiune intentionata</a><!-- (23.8)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/02/08/ril-admis-obligatia-de-plata-a-taxei-de-poluare/" rel="bookmark">RIL admis. Obligatia de plata a taxei de poluare</a><!-- (8.1)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/11/09/ril-admis-condamnari-cu-caracter-politic-si-masuri-administrative-asimilate/" rel="bookmark">RIL admis. Condamnari cu caracter politic si masuri administrative asimilate</a><!-- (8)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/07/ril-admis-mandat-european-de-arestare-intreruperea-prescriptiei-executarii-pedepsei/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sinteze IPI – decembrie 2011</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-ipi-decembrie-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-ipi-decembrie-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 12:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Instanţe Penale Internaţionale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instante Penale Internationale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ratko Mladic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribunalul Penal Internaţional pentru fosta Iugoslavie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decizia este publicata in extras in Curierul Judiciar nr. 3/2012. Rubrica de sinteze este realizata de Asist. univ. drd. Daniel Nitu.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/09/06/sinteze-ipi-%e2%80%93-mai-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze IPI – Mai 2011</a><!-- (29.7)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/02/17/sinteze-ipi-%e2%80%93-octombrie-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze IPI – octombrie 2011</a><!-- (22)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/05/16/sinteze-ipi-%e2%80%93-februarie-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze IPI – Februarie 2011</a><!-- (21.6)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-ipi-decembrie-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sinteze CJUE – decembrie 2011</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-cjue-decembrie-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-cjue-decembrie-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 12:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtea de Justiţie a Uniunii Europene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJUE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decizia este publicata in extras in Curierul Judiciar nr. 3/2012. Rubrica de sinteze este realizata de Lector univ. drd. Augustina Dumitrascu.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/06/21/sinteze-cjue-%e2%80%93-martie-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze CJUE – Martie 2011</a><!-- (37.7)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/05/16/sinteze-cjue-%e2%80%93-februarie-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze CJUE – Februarie 2011</a><!-- (34.7)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/02/17/sinteze-cjue-%e2%80%93-octombrie-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze CJUE – octombrie 2011</a><!-- (30.2)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-cjue-decembrie-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sinteze CEDO – decembrie 2011</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-cedo-decembrie-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-cedo-decembrie-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 12:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtea Europeană a Drepturilor Omului]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreptul la libertate si la siguranta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreptul la respectarea vietii private si de familie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreptul la un proces echitabil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertatea de intrunire si de asociere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deciziile sunt publicate in extras in Curierul Judiciar nr. 3/2012. Rubrica de sinteze este realizata de Lector univ. dr. Catrinel Brumar.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/10/12/sinteze-cedo-%e2%80%93-mai-iunie-iulie-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze CEDO – mai-iunie-iulie 2011</a><!-- (29.8)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/06/21/sinteze-cedo-%e2%80%93-martie-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze CEDO – Martie 2011</a><!-- (24.1)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/05/16/sinteze-cedo-%e2%80%93-februarie-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze CEDO – Februarie 2011</a><!-- (21.3)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-cedo-decembrie-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sinteze CC – decembrie 2011</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-cc-decembrie-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-cc-decembrie-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 12:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtea Constituţională]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abrogare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esalonarea platii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executarea hotararilor judecatoresti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legiferare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedura parlamentara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recunoasterea vinovatiei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restrangerea exercitiului unor drepturi.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retroactivitatea legii penale mai favorabile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tehnica legislativa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[titluri executorii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deciziile sunt publicate in extras in Curierul Judiciar nr. 3/2012. Rubrica de sinteze este realizata de Prof. univ. dr. Elena Simina Tanasescu si Conf. univ. dr. Stefan Deaconu.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/02/17/sinteze-cc-%e2%80%93-octombrie-2011/" rel="bookmark">Sinteze CC – octombrie 2011</a><!-- (10.1)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/05/16/curtea-constitutionala-decizia-nr-532011-m-of-nr-9003-02-2011/" rel="bookmark">Curtea Constitutionala, Decizia nr. 53/2011 (M.Of. nr. 90/03.02.2011)</a><!-- (8.2)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2010/06/28/reducerea-pensiilor-a-fost-declarata-neconstitutionala/" rel="bookmark">Reducerea pensiilor a fost declarată neconstituţională</a><!-- (7.7)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/sinteze-cc-decembrie-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Curtea de Apel Bucuresti, Sectia I Penala, Decizia nr. 1500/2011</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/curtea-de-apel-bucuresti-sectia-i-penala-decizia-nr-15002011/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/curtea-de-apel-bucuresti-sectia-i-penala-decizia-nr-15002011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 12:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Instanţe naţionale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noul cod de procedură penală]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refacerea urmăririi penale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restituirea cauzei la procuror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decizia este prezentata in extras si comentata de Victor Constantinescu in Curierul Judiciar nr. 3/2012.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2009/07/30/proiectul-noului-cod-de-procedura-penala-%e2%80%93-miza-reformei-procesului-penal-roman/" rel="bookmark">Proiectul noului Cod de procedura penala – miza reformei procesului penal roman</a><!-- (8.2)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2010/07/16/s-au-publicat-codurile-de-procedura-civila-si-penala/" rel="bookmark">S-au publicat Codurile de procedură civilă şi penală</a><!-- (7.4)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/a-aparut-curierul-judiciar-nr-32012/" rel="bookmark">A aparut Curierul Judiciar nr. 3/2012</a><!-- (7)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/04/curtea-de-apel-bucuresti-sectia-i-penala-decizia-nr-15002011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CJUE: Functionalitatea unui program pentru calculator si limbajul de programare nu pot fi protejate prin dreptul de autor</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/02/cjue-functionalitatea-unui-program-pentru-calculator-si-limbajul-de-programare-nu-pot-fi-protejate-prin-dreptul-de-autor/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/02/cjue-functionalitatea-unui-program-pentru-calculator-si-limbajul-de-programare-nu-pot-fi-protejate-prin-dreptul-de-autor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtea de Justiţie a Uniunii Europene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curtea de Justitie a Uniunii Europene a stabilit prin hotararea in cauza C-406/10 SAS Institute Inc./World Programming Ltd ca dobanditorul unei licente a unui program are, in principiu, dreptul de a analiza, de a studia si de a testa functionarea sa pentru a stabili ideile si principiile care se afla la baza acestuia.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:

momentan, nu exista.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/05/02/cjue-functionalitatea-unui-program-pentru-calculator-si-limbajul-de-programare-nu-pot-fi-protejate-prin-dreptul-de-autor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romania a fost condamnata la CEDO pentru incalcarea dreptului la viata</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/04/26/romania-a-fost-condamnata-la-cedo-pentru-incalcarea-dreptului-la-viata/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/04/26/romania-a-fost-condamnata-la-cedo-pentru-incalcarea-dreptului-la-viata/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtea Europeană a Drepturilor Omului]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crainiceanu si Frumusanu impotriva Romaniei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreptul la viata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marti, 24 aprilie, CEDO a condamnat Romania la plata unei sume totale de 60.000 de euro pentru prejudicii morale apropiatilor celor doi tineri romani ucisi de gloante in timpul dispersarii unei manifestatii in fata sediului guvernului de la Bucuresti, in 1991.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/02/14/cedo-condamna-din-nou-romania-pentru-incalcarea-dreptului-la-un-proces-echitabil/" rel="bookmark">CEDO condamna din nou Romania pentru incalcarea dreptului la un proces echitabil</a><!-- (23.9)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/05/25/romania-a-fost-condamnata-de-cedo-privind-ancheta-in-dosarul-revolutiei/" rel="bookmark">Romania a fost condamnata de CEDO privind ancheta in “Dosarul Revolutiei”</a><!-- (22.8)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2011/01/27/romania-din-nou-condamnata-la-cedo/" rel="bookmark">Romania din nou condamnata la CEDO</a><!-- (22.6)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/04/26/romania-a-fost-condamnata-la-cedo-pentru-incalcarea-dreptului-la-viata/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lipsa de diligenta a autoritatilor vamale nationale poate justifica remiterea unei datorii vamale</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/03/26/lipsa-de-diligenta-a-autoritatilor-vamale-nationale-poate-justifica-remiterea-unei-datorii-vamale/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/03/26/lipsa-de-diligenta-a-autoritatilor-vamale-nationale-poate-justifica-remiterea-unei-datorii-vamale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtea de Justiţie a Uniunii Europene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datorie vamala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garantie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lipsa de diligenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remitere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tranzit comunitar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CJUE a stabilit prin Hotararea in cauza C-506/09 P, Portugaliac Transnautica – Transportes e Navegacao, ca lipsa de diligenta a autoritatilor vamale nationale atunci cand accepta o garantie insuficienta pentru a acoperi datoria vamala rezultata dintr-un ansamblu de operatiuni de tranzit comunitar extern justifica remiterea acesteia.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:

momentan, nu exista.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/03/26/lipsa-de-diligenta-a-autoritatilor-vamale-nationale-poate-justifica-remiterea-unei-datorii-vamale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transportatorul aerian trebuie sa acorde deservire pasagerilor al caror zbor a fost anulat in imprejurari exceptionale</title>
		<link>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/03/26/transportatorul-aerian-trebuie-sa-acorde-deservire-pasagerilor-al-caror-zbor-a-fost-anulat-in-imprejurari-exceptionale/</link>
		<comments>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/03/26/transportatorul-aerian-trebuie-sa-acorde-deservire-pasagerilor-al-caror-zbor-a-fost-anulat-in-imprejurari-exceptionale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luminita Chitoran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curtea de Justiţie a Uniunii Europene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenţă]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anulare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denise McDonagh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imprejurari exceptionale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obligatia de asistenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obligatia de deservire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryanair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transport aerian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trimitere preliminara]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curieruljudiciar.ro/?p=16110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curtea de Justitie a Uniunii Europene a comunicat pe 22 martie 2012 concluziile avocatului general Yves Bot, in cauza C-12/11, Denise McDonagh c. Ryanair Ltd, potrivit caruia operatorul de transport aerian trebuie sa acorde deservire pasagerilor al caror zbor a fost anulat din cauza unor imprejurari exceptionale, precum inchiderea spatiului aerian ca urmare a eruptiei vulcanului Eyjafjallajokull.<p class="feed-related">Alte articole pe aceeasi tema:

momentan, nu exista.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curieruljudiciar.ro/2012/03/26/transportatorul-aerian-trebuie-sa-acorde-deservire-pasagerilor-al-caror-zbor-a-fost-anulat-in-imprejurari-exceptionale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: curieruljudiciar.ro @ 2012-05-22 21:40:20 -->
